March 28, 2001

Biocentrism and/or Anthropocentrism and/or a Combination Thereof

Until today I had not heard of the words "biocentrism" or "anthropocentrism." After some brief research I have determined that biocentrism is rooted in advocating that nature must be a priority for humans while anthropocentrism sees the human being as made in the image of God, and possessing a divine soul.  I see the need for reciprocity or for a blend of "biocentrism" and "anthropocetnrism."

Ideally I aim to be to be human-centred (anthropocentric) while at the same time I am focused on being nature-centred (biocentric). I see both as mutually inclusive. With which "ism" should I be identified? I disagree that "human" and "nature" are opposite and separate. If either of these "isms" are ideologies, I will simply avoid adhering to the definitions because I no longer permit ideas to control me and I see no need to discredit the opposing view. Instead, I take control of ideas and thereby tear down walls and barriers.

Does this planet earth belong to no one or does it belong to everyone? Are we humans with a spirit  form or spirits with a human form? I prefer to live as a spirit who has taken on a human form for this incarnation on planet earth.

Must Christians people who rely on dogma be expected to oppose biocentrism? Is it necessary for biocentrism to oppose economic growth? Maybe biocentrism ought to be opposed to the orthodox economic system of "usury-bearing" finance which breeds scarcity and lack for the majority of humans? Is it possible that biocentrism could not only support but facilitate and foster an alternative system of "usury-free" finance which has the capacity to deliver prosperity and abundance for everyone on planet earth?

Must spiritually evolved people be opposed to anthropocentrism? It is necessary for anthropocentrism to oppose ecological maintenance? Maybe anthropocentrism ought to be opposed to the orthodox economic system of "usury-bearing" finance which breeds scarcity and lack for the majority of humans? It is possible that anthropocentrism could not only support but facilitate and foster an alternative system of "usury-free' fiance which has the capacity fo deliver prosperity and abundance for everyone on planet earth?

My life from 1948 unti the present has been about "economics" pivoted against "ecology" and the "environment." Since 1980, I have been working and networking with both biocentric and anthopocentric people (without specifically defining who is who) and teaching them the "truth" about the design flaw of "usury" and how it must be exposed and replaced with the perfect "usury-free" banking system software.

To survive after the upcoming economic crash, humans may need to create and maintain a healthy blend of ideas selected from biocentrism and anthropocentrism. To facilitate the learning process I have complied some information for those who wish to be informed.