Is the Cult of Catholicism More Than A Religion?
And Who is Really in Charge?

By Tommy-Usury: Free

 

Ron Graham, authored  the book ‘God’s Dominion – A Sceptic’s Quest’ in 1990 wherein on page 12 he wrote: ‘Before 1950 approximately two-thirds of adult Canadians were said to attend a church or synagogue regularly; after 1980 the estimate went down to one-third.’ I daresay that as we progress into this 21st Century, the decline in church attendance continues to escalate as ‘thinking’ individuals are asking questions and questioning answers like no generation before them. Consider how the ceaseless campaign of Ignace Bourget - the Biship of Montreal from 1840 until 1876 -  conditioned Quebec’s Catholics to be subservient to the Catholic Church and the ‘infallible’ Pope. Bishop Ignace Bourget instructed Catholics to repeat and live by this statement: “I listen to my Curé, my Curé  listens to the Bishop, the Bishop listens to the Pope, the Pope listens to Our Lord Jesus Christ, who aids with the Holy Spirit to render them infallible on the teaching and government of His Church.” But the hierarchy of the Catholic Church has neglected to address the design flaw of ‘usury’ for centuries. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about - or is this refusal by the Pope and others in the Catholic Church hierarchy to address the design flaw of ‘usury’ one possible reason for the great exodus of Catholics from the Catholic Church in the last half of the 20th Century?

 

Historically, the Catholic Church was opposed to ‘usury’ because of its astonishing property of ‘creating money that does not exist when the principal is loaned.’ In fact, for a very long time it was considered the greatest of cardinal since to extract ‘usury’ on a debt – mostly because ‘usury’ attributed a God-like power to money. BUT in more modern times, the Catholic Church in general and the Papacy in particular have remained a focal point of global attention under the astute direction of the Jesuits. In fact, the complexities and contradictions within the Papacy leave many wondering whether the Pope is still a leading player within the Usury Elites’ Group of Companies, thereby amassing and managing (in name of the Catholic Church) massive amounts of property, money and gold in the Vatican Trust, - one of the world’s top trusts.

 

Like any modern institution of the 21st Century, there are opposing forces within the Catholic Church - those who incessantly work to further the goal of the Usury Elites’ to create their New World Order of  total ‘economic enslavement’ and those whom I consider to be ‘white knights’ because they are networking with ‘usuryfree’ creatives everywhere to create ‘peace and plenty’ by 2020. The challenge is to determine who’s who and for what team are they working!

 

I am wondering if the current Pope - the two hundred and sixty-third Pope - is a co-operative player with The Usury Elites or is he really dedicated to being on the side of we-the-usuryfree-creatives and thereby resisting the grand design of the Jesuit General, - the Black Pope, Count Hans Kolvenbach. Remember, Pope John Paul II’s  life was threatened with gunshot wounds on Wednesday, May 13th, 1981.
 

One wonders if that was a warning to play the game with the Usury Elites or risk an early death. Over the years Pope John Paul II has become very popular all over the world. Is there a concerted effort by the mainstream media to discredit the current Pope with the scandal about the Catholic priests who have been sexually abusing children because  this Pope is an important behind-the-scenes player for ‘usuryfree’ economics? There’s a war going on among the Usury Elites now that they know their gig is almost up !!

 

I have received emails from cyberspace friends who are similarly doing much research about GOD (Gold, Oil and Drugs) and other elements of how the Catholic Church is a key player in the world of politics and power. Some of these researchers explain that Pope John Paul II wants to tell the ‘truth’ to we-the-people about the Usury Elites’ power and control and how they manipulate the world’s people. In years past, George Bush Senior has visited the Vatican on more than one occasion. Perhaps George Bush Senior was never able to persuade this current Pope to give his full support to their New World Order which needs a One World Religion to go along with their One World Currency and their One World Government and their One World Army etc. Just wondering? Is Pope John Paul II listening to (a) we-the-people  or (b) the Jesuit General otherwise known as the ‘Black Pope?’ Is the Pope indifferent or is the Pope serious about his calls for a reform of the financial and economic systems of the world so that they will serve we-the-people instead of enslaving we-the-people? I draw your attention to the comments of other Popes and Pope John Paul II’ comments below.

 

Additionally, Eric Jon Phelps writes in his book ‘Vatican Assassins’ that there is a General of the Jesuits commonly known as ‘the Black Pope’ whose mission is to keep  the Pope in check.. On page 249 he writes: ‘If a Pope becomes politically “liberal” favouring the rights of the people, he is punished, as Pius IX in 1848. Pius resisted the policy of the Jesuits’ Holy Alliance by declaring himself a liberal, favouring popular government, as he proclaimed a general amnesty to political offenders and began to form a Constitution for Italy with Rossi. This resulted in the Jesuits causing a revolution in 1848 forcing the pope to flee the city. Upon his return in 1849, protected by the French troops of Napoleon III, Pius IX obeyed his Jesuit masters becoming thoroughly absolutist for the rest of his Pontificate.’

 

Eric Jon Phelps continues on page 249 of  ‘Vatican Assassins’ to explain what happens when a Pope ignores the direction of ‘the Black Pope’ as was the case with Pope John XXIII wherein he writes: ‘But if the Pope determines to resist the power and purpose of the “Father General” he suddenly dies, as Pope John XXIII in 1963. Pope John resisted the Jesuit General’s ‘secret policy’ of continuing the Cold War. He promoted the Order’s ‘open policy’ of ending the Cold War in seeking to establish a World Government put forth during the Second Vatican Council. A few months later President Kennedy was assassinated as he pursued the World-Government policy of Pope John XXIII in seeking to prematurely end the Cold War by withdrawing troops from Vietnam. That assassination was carried out by the Cold Warriors of Cardinal Spellman. They were the Knights of Malta and Shriners in alliance with the Jesuit Order.’

 

Eric Jon Phelps points out that indeed, President John F. Kennedy was ‘wounded in the house of his friends, one of them being his own father – Cardinal Spellman’s most powerful Knight of Malta – Joseph Kennedy.’ This significant world event of November 22, 1963 draws attention to these famous words penned by Ignatius Loyola from four centuries ago and recorded on page 47 of W.C. Brownlee’s book ‘Secret Instructions of the Jesuits’ and published in 1857: ‘Finally; - Let all with such artfulness gain the ascendant over princes, noblemen, and the magistrates of every place, that they may be ready at our beck, even to sacrifice their nearest relations and most intimate friends, when we say it is for our interest and advantage.’

 

And I didn’t learn that in my Baltimore Catechism at the Church of the Assumption in Erinsville, Ontario, Canada when I was growing up as a young boy – where memorizing answers to carefully controlled questions – with the elements of fear and intimidation – were the  definite trademarks of rural Catholic faith. In fact, we were not even permitted to read the Holy Bible, instead relying on ‘Bible History’ textbook prescribed by the Catholic Church.

 

According to the Michael Journal, (1101 Principale St, Rougemont, Quebec J0L IM0) Pope Jean Paul II wrote in his first encyclical – Redemptor Hominis, March 4th, 1979 – ‘the indispensable transformations of the structures of economic life … of poverty amidst plenty that brings into question the financial and monetary mechanisms … man cannot become the slave of economic systems.’

 

In a homily at Flueli, Switzerland, on June 14th, 1984, Pope John Paul II said: ‘As a democratic society, see carefully to all that is happening in this powerful world of money. The world of finance is also a human world, our world, submitted to the conscience of all of us. …. So see especially to it that you may bring a contribution to world peace with your economy and your banks, and not a contribution – in perhaps an indirect way – to war and injustice!’

 

Then is his message to the 6th United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva, September 26th, 1985. Pope John Paul II said: ‘Again, I want to tackle a very delicate and painful issue. I mean the torment of the representatives of several countries, who no longer know how to face the fearful problem of indebtedness. A structural reform of the world financial system is, without doubt, one of the initiatives that seem the most urgent and necessary.’

 

Notice that Pope John Paul II never uses the word ‘usury’ when speaking about economic injustice, though he does talk about the necessity of reforming the world financial system. The multiple millions of reverent Catholics docilely accept the Pope’s platitudes - which really don’t offer any solutions to our ever-worsening economic crisis on a local, national and international level. It is likely that most Catholics know that if they questioned the Pope about ‘usury’ and/or rebelled they would be regarded by their peers (family, friends and neighbours) as traitors and the Catholic Church’s worst enemies. If they only knew the ‘truth’ there would be a revolution by tomorrow morning. I’m not decided whether Pope John Paul II is with we-the-people or with the New World Order.

 

Now let’s go back in history and examine the lives of a couple of Pope’s who dared to resist the tyranny of the Usury Elites. Here’s a thought-provoking quote about Pope Clement XIV, (1769 – 1774) from page 200 of Eric Jon Phelps book entitled ‘Vatican Assassins’, published in 2001. ‘After a four-year investigation and pressured by the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe, this brave Pope suppressed the Society of Jesus (the Jesuits) with a  Papal Bull (a Bull is the strongest legal document that the Pope can issue) on July 21, 1773. He knew the signing of the Bull would be his death warrant. Fourteen months later he lay dead having been poisoned by those masters of murder; as, the Italians declared the Pope’s death to be a work of the Jesuits in obedience to their god, the Black Pope.’

 

And how about Pope John Paul I, 1978? On page 201 of the ‘Vatican Assassins’, Eric Jon Phelps writes: ‘After only thirty-three days in occupying St. Peter’s Chair, this brave Papal Ceasar (Pope) was poisoned by the Masonic agents of the Jesuits within Ceasar’s Palace (the Vatican). Found dead one morning by a nun, no autopsy was ever performed and no official death certificate has ever been issued. His fatal error was in attempting to formally relieve Pedro Arrupe of his command as the Superior General of the Society of Jesus. He should have learned his lesson from Pope Clement XIV.’

 

Pope John XXIII dared to speak out about our orthodox money system. On May 15th, 1961 in his Encyclical Letter, ‘Mater et Magistra,’ Pope John XXIII wrote: ‘The dignity of the human person necessarily requires the right of using external goods to live according to the right norm of nature. And to this right corresponds a most serious obligation, which requires that, so far as possible, there be given to all an opportunity of possessing private property … Therefore, it is necessary to modify economic and social life so that the way is made easier for widespread private possession of such things as durable goods, homes, gardens, tools requisite for artisan enterprises and family-type farms, investments in enterprises of medium or large size.’

 

Another outspoken pope was Pope Paul VI. On March 26th, 1967, in his Encyclical Letter, Populorum Progressio – On The Development of Peoples,’ Pope Paul VI wrote: ‘ … the economy should be at the service of man. But if it is true that a type of capitalism has been the source of excessive suffering, injustices and fratricidal conflicts whose effects still persist, it would be wrong to attribute to industrialization itself evils that belong to the calamitous system that accompanied it.’

 

Joe Mason and Dee Finney have posted some very thought-provoking information at their website www.greatdreams.com about Pope Paul V1. You can find the information (see below) that I have referenced at this specific webpage:  www.greatdreams.com/consp.htm#PAULVI

“In the photographs taken of Pope Paul VI, one might think that the differences are just because of aging, but that is not the case. The later photos show a Pope with a more hooked nose, of a different shape, more rounded, from the earlier Pope.  

The ear shapes are completely different, including the size of the lobes. The jaw of the earlier Pope is much more prominent than the later Pope.

The later Pope is thought to be an Italian Actor, who had plastic surgery to make him look like the Pope, supposedly arranged by Cardinals Villot, Benelli and Casaroli. These three men made sure that few people got close to the new Pope, who was being kept hostage, drugged and bound to his chair.

Other people suspected something strange was going on and investigated it. Author Theodor Kolberg of Germany wrote his findings on the case in his book "Unsturg um Vatikan? (An Overthrow of the Vatican?). He even got voiceprints of the two Popes to show the differences using recordings of public blessings. Father Malachi Martin also was aware of the situation.

One of the duties of the imposter Pope was to present new encyclicals which put the Catholic Church in bad standing. The real Pope endured as a hostage until he finally died in 1978. Meanwhile the false Pope installed Benelli to a Cardinal in 1977 so he would have a chance at becoming Pope himself. He aligned himself with communist and Masonic forces to become a likely candidate to antipope.

Once it became clear that Benelli would not become Pope, he arranged it so Albino Luciani would be elected Pope John Paul I.  As you will see below, Pope John Paul I was murdered with 1 month of his election to Pope. Luciani was naive to politics and was vocal with announcing his intention to continue the reforms of his predecessors. He was in good health. Everyone was shocked when he died of an apparent heart attack 34 days later. What was more unusual, 4 other people died of apparent heart attacks within  that same 4 weeks of his papacy.

Benelli fell short of the 75 votes needed to be elected the new Pope and after Cardinal Giovanni Benelli’s candidacy stalled, the electors decided they would look outside Italy, and König suggested a man from behind the Iron Curtain. and unexpectedly Carlinda Karol Wojtyla of Poland was elected. What was strange was that Villot, Benelli, and Casaroli were selected by the new Pope to run important departments within the Vatican. Since they worked so closely with the new Pope, the communists felt assured they had a victory even though Benelli didn't become Pope.

In 1981 when Pope Paul II was gunned down in the streets, the communists were even more sure they were victorious, but miraculously, the Pope overcame his dire injuries. There were several other attempts on his life, but he escaped with his life intact.

Much time has passed since then. Villot died in a car accident on March 9, 1979. Casaroli died on June 10, 1998. According to Kathleen Keating in her book, "The Final Warning", Benelli is still alive but quite old now, however, reputable websites say that Cardinal Benelli died in 1982. (Cardinalate. Created cardinal priest, June 27, 1977; received red biretta and title of S. Prisca, June 27, 1977. Attended IV Ordinary Assembly of World Synod of Bishops, Vatican City, September 30-October 29, 1977. Participated in conclave of August 25-26, 1978. Participated in conclave of October 14-16, 1978. Attended I Plenary Assembly of Sacred College of Cardinals, Vatican City, November 5-9, 1979; V Ordinary Assembly of World Synod of Bishops, Vatican City, September 26-October 25, 1980. Death. October 26, 1982, Florence. Buried, metropolitan cathedral basilica S. Maria del Fiore, Florence. www.fiu.edu/~mirandas/bios-b.htm It is quite obvious that Pope John Paul II does not have much longer to live as he is extremely frail.

It is critical to remember that this will be the first conclave of the third millennium. That fact alone will impose tremendous psychological pressure on the electors to be forward looking, choosing a man who embodies the church of the future. That means the developing world, where seventy percent of Catholics today live - and the only place where the church is experiencing significant growth.  This could mean an African such as Nigerian Cardinal Francis Arinze, but for men accustomed to “thinking in centuries,” the African church (below the Sahara) probably seems far too new, too fluid to be ready for the papacy. There aren’t enough Catholics in Asia for that region to make sense. Thus if the cardinals want a Third World Pope, it seems more likely they will turn to a Latin American.”

Pope John Paul II is not the first Pope to speak publicly about the defects of our orthodox money system. Pope Pius XI had this to say: ‘This power becomes particularly irresistible when exercised by those who, because they hold and control money, are also able to govern credit and determine its allotment, for that reason supplying, so to speak, the lifeblood to the entire economic body, and grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of production, so that no one dare breathe against their will.’

 

Popestock 2002, heralded as a great ‘tribal gathering’ and a ‘religious awakening’ and otherwise known as ‘World Youth Day’ was indeed a well-orchestrated event - which lasted much longer than a day for those multiple thousands of charismatic, Catholic pilgrims who attended and the multiple millions of Catholic traditionalists from all over the world, who sat riveted to their televisions sets for days on end. Dubious onlookers did dare to ask lots of questions and question lots of answers about the series of precisely planned events in Ontario, Canada which were staged over a two week period at the end of July 2002. World Youth Day culminated with a special event (Mass) in Toronto on Sunday, July 28th, 2002, to promote local, national and global Catholicism.

 

On the last weekend of July 2002, the stirring event of  Popestock muscled its way into the very heart of our Canadian culture aided and abetted by the electronic and print mainstream media - who often spent more time focusing on the minority demonstrations by pressure groups than on the 800,000 who attended the mass. Was ‘Popestock 2002’ designed to lure the youth of the 21st Century into the Catholic Church where their absence has demonstrated that they no longer want or need to be controlled by the ‘fear and intimidation’ that so-controlled their parents’ and grandparents’generations?

 

One wonders what significant role Popestock 2002 will play in enhancing (or thwarting) the ultimate plan of the Usury Elites to establish their New World Order. It is noteworthy that not once (to my knowledge) during the festivities and celebration surrounding Popestock 2002 did Pope John Paul II or anyone from the hierarchy of the Catholic Church address the ‘design flaw of usury’ and how it is destroying local, national and global economies. Nor was the solution of ‘usuryfree’ time currencies advocated and promoted as the last, best way to empower we-the-people in this 21st Century.

 

How many of the 800,000+ who attended the Mass on Sunday, July 28th, 2002 knew about how ‘usuryfree’ time currency could be the optimal “Christian’ solution on a local, national and global level? Not many. I daresay that more Muslims understand the ‘power and potential’ of ‘usuryfree’ finance than Christians in general and Catholics specifically. There was an article entitled ‘Creative Financing’ and written by Kathryn Young on Page J1 of the Ottawa Citizen on Saturday, August 3rd, 2002 wherein she explained in the subtitle: ‘With an estimated 50,000 to 75,000 Muslims in the Ottawa area, there’s a growing market for Islamic financing -  innovative arrangements that don’t include interest.’

 

Kathryn Young writes in the article: SNIP ….‘Muslims don’t believe in interest.’ explains Riad Saloojee, Executive Director of CAIR-Can, the Council of American-Islamic Relations, Canada. In fact, the Koran disallows interest.’ Then she extracts a quote directly from the Koran: “And Allah hath permitted trade and forbidden usury,” ‘says the Muslim holy book in 2:275. Usury is the practice of lending money at interest,’…….SNIP…..

 

Kathryn Young then describes a common concept of ‘Creative Co-op Group Purchasing” without ‘usury,’ within Muslim communities and she finishes the article with this paragraph: ‘And it’s worth noting that Muslims aren’t the only religious group that doesn’t believe in interest. The Christian and Jewish traditions also contain prohibitions against it. Several verses in the Old Testament of the Bible, the Torah and Jesus say that people should NOT charge interest when they lend money.’ This being so, is it any wonder why more and more Catholics are learning about the evils of ‘usury’ and wondering why the Catholic Church engages in the practice thereby speaking with forked tongue.

 

Aside from the obvious absence of any talk about ‘usury’ many of the attendees at ‘Popestock 2002’ lauded the positive concept of a ‘God Focus’ which apparently enthralled them. Unfortunately, too many of the ‘pilgrims’ misdirected their

 

There was a definite positive element of Popestock 2002 which promoted a ‘God Focus’ concept though some of the participants misdirected their ‘God Focus’ to the ‘infallible’ Pope as the closest human being to God on Planet earth - forgetting that God is within every living creature on planet earth, and therefore recognizing that we don’t need to be worshipping any gurus - including Pope John Paul II. It’s unlikely that these youth who are so ready to worship Pope John Paul II as their guru know that it was Pope Pius IX (1846 - 1878) who called for the First Vatican Council at which he was decreed to be ‘infallible’ thereby becoming God Almighty - right here on earth. So this myth of ‘infallibility’ may not be as Divine as most Catholics believe. Instead, ‘infallibility’ is a definite doctrine developed by the Catholic Church hierarchy and resides in the Pope so he can effectively rule the congregation through ‘faith and fear.’ And yes, just a coincidence, nothing to worry about - Pope Pius IX just happened to be Pope when Abraham Lincoln was assassinated.

 

Indeed, the Usury Elites are in the midst of a crisis and I am wondering if they need to be rid of Pope John Paul II so the Black Pope can put their choice of leader in position to head their One World Religion – whatever that will be! So expect the battle to rage on over the revelations of sex abuse scandals as the strategists for the Usury Elites whose agenda is to create their New World Order keep trying to infiltrate mainstream religion to find ‘builders of a civilization of usury’ rather than revealing the that ‘usury’ is the real cause of the misery of we-the-people.

 

I draw your attention to the article below entitled ‘Drastic Times In Argentina.’
 

PS: On Tuesday, July 30th, 2002 the following article appeared on page D6 in the Business Section of the Ottawa Citizen.

 

Drastic Times In Argentina
By Helen Murphy


San Vicente, Argentina: (Bloomberg News)

 

Livestock thefts have doubled in San Vicente this year as an economic crisis turns impoverished Argentines into rustlers.

 

“They come in the middle of the night with horse-drawn carts, shoot or slit the animal’s throat and carve up the meat in the field,” said Horacio Ciurlandi, 48, who owns a 4,500 hectare ranch in San Vicente, a rural community 45 kilometres south of Buenos Aires. “All we find is tracks in the mud and a carcass stripped of flesh.”

 

A four year recession has pushed unemployment to a record 22 per cent, sending half of Argentina’s 36 million people below the poverty line and leaving almost a quarter of them without enough food, government figures show.

 

To feed their families, some steal cattle. Other crime is also on the rise, including kidnapping. With the economy set to contract a further 15 per cent this year, illegal activities will probably increase, police and sociologists say.

 

Animals butchered recently included dairy cows, horses, pigs and ailing livestock. Experienced rustlers target healthy steers being raised for beef, ranchers say.

 

“People are so desperate they are butchering sick animals – even those that have died from natural causes – and dairy cattle, which are virtually inedible,” said Horcaio Delguy, the president of the National Agriculture Front, a farmers’ association.

 

The spread of poverty has accelerated since Argentina defaulted on its debt and froze savings accounts in December and a month later, abandoned a decade-old exchange rate. The peso has dropped 73 per cent since then.

 

In the first half of the year, 3.2 million people, or about 17,500 a day have fallen below the poverty line, according to Consultoria Equis, a firm that conducts surveys. The government  sets the poverty line at a monthly income level of 730 pesos ($315 Cdn) for a family of four.

 

Lines for food and clothing outside the San Cayetano church relief centre in Buenos Aires “are getting longer each month.” Said Andres Pagani, one of the centre’s organizers. “Many of those waiting are in a pitiful state.”

 

Former high-school teacher Ruben Fuentes is one of the 4,000 people who, according to government figures, sleep on the streets of Buenos Aires each night.

 

“I lost my home around February and now I share a doorstep with three others,” said Mr. Fuentes, who taught for 15 years before losing his job. Now he rummages through trash for scraps of food and to salvage bottles, which he sells for four pesos ($1.73) per 100, and soda cans, which fetch two pesos (86 cents) for 300.

 

Some families sell their hair. In March, the Pelucas Beauty Centre wig factory, 312 kilometres north of Buenos Aires, advertised for human hair as the peso’s drop made imports of artificial materials too expensive.

 

The response to the advertisement “was incredible,” said Mariana Moglione, who manages the company. She pays as much as 90 pesos ($38.87) for a full head of 70-centimetre long hair. Some families traveled 30 kilometres by bicycle to deliver their hair, said Ms. Moglione.

 

The plight of Argentinians doesn’t appear to be ending anytime soon, with a group of economic advisors warning that the country must stop its cash-strapped provinces from printing their own currencies and curb the use of its dwindling reserves to prop up the peso to rebuild its economy.

 

Former Bundesbank President Hans Tietmeyer and three other former central bankers appointed to try to bridge differences between the government and the International Monetary Fund, said Argentines face more sacrifices before the economy recovers.

 

“Confidence is at a low ebb, not only in the economic and financial system, but also in social and political structures,” the panel, which visited Argentina last week, said in a report, released today by the IMF.

 

Farmers like Jose Luis Bugallo don’t have time to wait for an increase in political and economic confidence in the economy. They are taking steps now to protect their property.

 

Thieves stole 10 of his cattle last month, he said. Because he lacks faith in the ability of police to combat crime, he is rigging electrified fences with alarms around his 150 hectare farm in San Vicente. He also carries a rifle, which he said he would use against intruders.

 

“People are hungry, I recognize that,” said Mr. Bugallo,. “But this is my livelihood and I will protect it.”

 

This paragraph caught my attention form the above story:

 

‘The plight of Argentinians doesn’t appear to be ending anytime soon, with a group of economic advisors warning that the country must stop its cash-strapped provinces from printing their own currencies and curb the use of its dwindling reserves to prop up the peso to rebuild its economy.’ We know that these economic advisors are working for the ‘Usury Elites’ by their words of warning that the ‘cash-strapped provinces’ must be stopped from printing their own currencies. The more the provinces create and spend their own ‘usuryfree’ currency the more they free their people from the bondage and enslavement of the Usury Elites. In fact, the network of people in Argentina who are following the example of the ‘cash-strapped provinces’ and thereby surviving by creating and spending their own ‘usuryfree’ community currencies has grown to approximately 3 million. More details at the Argentina Cyberclassroom: www.cyberclass.net/argentina.htm

 

In the 1500’s the Jesuitical colonization began in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay by traveling up the Paraguay and Parana Rivers to ‘Christianize’ the nomadic tribes of  Indians. The Jesuits easily dominated them and made them docile to their ‘Christian’ teachings by simply providing them a little tobacco and some skills about food and how to grow it in abundance so that they could settle in one location and therefore not have to be nomadic.
 

 During the 17th Century the Jesuits were given powers by the Court of Spain to create a “Jesuit State’ which developed and flourished  as the Indians were catechized and trained to live a sedentary lifestyle under (a) a discipline that was described as ‘gentle but strong’ and (b) an arrangement whereby everything they owned became ‘God’s Property’ – under the control of the Jesuits – of course.

 

Then in 1767, King Charles III of Spain expelled the Jesuits from many of his American dominions, including Argentina. There were at least 1,000 Jesuits forcibly returned to Europe from Argentina. It would be interesting to know why Charles III expelled the Jesuits from Argentina.
 

One wonders what role is any is currently being played by the Catholic Church and the Pope and/or the Black Pope in this current economic devastation of Argentina? After all, over 50 per cent of the Catholic Church’s strength comes from Latin America. Furthermore, Pierre Dominique, authored the book “La Politique des Jesuits’ which was published in Paris (1965). On page 191, he writes about Bishop Palafox who was sent to South America in 1647 as an apostolic visitor by Pope Innocent III. Bishop Palafox wrote a letter back to Pope Innocent III stating: ‘All the wealth of South America is in the hands of the Jesuits.’ Has anything changed - that is the question? Are the fears that were expressed by the researchers of the 17th Century being proved right again in this 21st Century?

 

On August 1st, 2002 over one million people gathered in Mexico to see and hear Pope John Paul II canonize Juan Diego, a saint from the 16th Century. Juan Diego, supposedly was instrumental as a catalyst in converting millions of indigenous peoples to Christianity. (Some historical researchers are questioning whether Juan Diego actually existed.) What was going on here? Was this just a mission to rejuvenate Catholicism or is there a more sinister plan to this 21st Century phenomenon of exalting the Pope? I wonder how many of the Mexicans are aware of the following particular details of their history as described by Eric Jon Phelps on pages 462 and 463 of ‘Vatican Assassins’?

 

The Jesuits brought Carranza to power in Mexico, igniting the Mexican Civil War and here’s the background details.

 

‘In  recalling the past, the Mexican people with the great Benito Juarez had provoked the Jesuits to anger! They defended their “liberal” Constitution of 1857 with the “War of Reform” from 1858 to 1861. President Juarez then broke the Temporal Power of the Pope over Mexico and later executed the Austrian usurper in 1867, further enraging the Jesuits. Although the Order murdered our hero in 1872, the Mexican people expelled it in 1873. Can you imagine the unbridled rage of Satan’s Jesuit General – the Black Pope?

 

Three years passed when in 1876 the Company punished the freedom-loving Mexican people. As the Jesuits had overthrown the second French Republic with the dictatorship of Napoleon III, even so they overthrew the Mexican Republic with the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz. He readmitted the Sons of Loyola and for thirty years oppressed the people, robbing them of their land and liberty. But by 1910 the people had had enough of the Jesuit-controlled dictator’s “altar and throne.” A revolution broke out as a result of rigged elections and Diaz fled the country. Francisco Madero was elected President in 1913 but was quickly assassinated by the Jesuits who then installed another tyrant, Victoriano Huerta. This gave rise to the resistance of Panchero Villa in the north and Emiliano Zapata in the south – the Revoluion’s greatest enemies of the Jesuits.! As a result, that same year Huerta was defeated and fled.

 

The Mexican people would now begin to pay dearly for their desire to be free from the dictators controlled by the Jesuit priests. In 1914, the Order brought Venustiano Carranza to power and used its Fourteenth Amendment American Empire to recognize his de facto rule! What a disgrace to us Americans! Our two heroes warred with Carranza for six years until Zapata was murdered and Villa surrendered. From the years of 1910 to 1920 Mexico ran red with blood, the Revolution claiming one million lives – thanks to the Jesuits!

 

From the years of 1921 to 1928 the great anti-Jesuit Presidents Obregon and Calles honestly attempted to maintain a liberal government for the Mexican people. Calles at one time deported two hundred Spanish Jesuit priests and had to subdue murderous Catholic guerilla bands leading to the Cristero Rebellion. From the beginning of the revolution to this time Avro Manhattan writes”: - “The result was one of the most deadly civil wars ever experienced, which cost Mexico nearly one million dead. The civil war was conceived, provoked, and openly carried out by the Catholic Church, encouraged and financed by North American Big Business, just like the Bolshevik Revolution. Catholic armies sprang into the field and, shouting the name of Jesus, went to assault for the overthrow of the “anti-Christian,” anti-Catholic Mexican Government of President Calles.”

 

Though the great Mexican Revolution was valiantly fought by its patriots and provided inspiration for the Spaniards waging their Civil War with Franco in the 1930’s, by the end of 1945 Mexico was clearly in the hands of the Jesuit General. This terrible suffering of our southern neighbours was a part of the Jesuit General’s Second Thirty Years’ War brought into Mexico. And why? Because the people of Benito Juarez broke the Temporal Power of the Pope, expelled the Jesuits and asserted their national sovereignty – three deadly sins! And how did the Vatican’s Jesuits punish Mexico? They used their “Holy Roman American Empire” – “the Sword of the Church” – to foment a bloody Civil War which ultimately cost the Mexican people rivers of blood, its earthly treasures and national life. Today poverty-stricken and demoralized Mexico is the great haven for the Black Pope’s International Drug Trade overseen by his intelligence communities managed by the Knights of Malta.”
 

In summary, let’s explore the history of the ‘Secret Plans At Chieri’ (Near Turin in Northen Italy) as laid out by the Jesuits and then consider what is happening in the world in 2002!! Yes, all people, including all of the ‘Youthful Pilgrims for Catholicism’ who attended Popestock 2002, need to be aware of this grand design of the ‘hidden agenda’ of the Jesuit Order – which exerts much control over (a) global Catholicism and (b) many other aspects of world politics and financial power. Eric Jon Phelps writes about the ‘Secret Plans At Chieri’ on pages 263, 264, & 265 in ‘Vatican Assassins.’

 

‘In 1825, some eleven years after the revival of the Jesuit Order, a secret meeting of leading Jesuits was held at their College at Chieri near Turin, in Northern Italy. At that gathering plans were discussed for the advancement of Papal power, world-wide, for the destabilizing of governments who stood in the way and for the crushing of all opposition to Jesuit schemes and ambitions.

 

A young Jesuit, named Leone, a favourite of the Rector at Chieri (who subsequently became General of the Order) took notes of the speeches and discussions at Chieri and these were afterwards published by a French publisher. In 1848, they were translated into English and published as a book entitled The Secret Plan by Leone, which has been thoroughly authenticated and can be read in the Library of the British Museum. It makes enlightening reading and we will now reproduce five extracts as originally published by the late Augusta Cooke.

 

A.     Long Term Plan For World Government

The first generation will not belong to us; the second will nearly belong to us; the third will entirely belong to us. You well know that what we aim at, is the Empire of the World.

 

B.     Working In Secret And Using Duplicity

Let us prefer a Secret War, let us shun too much light. Every Bishop must vigorously act upon this principle, be gentle but inflexible – Let him know how to assume the demeanor of a lamb… which will win all hearts; but let him also know how to act with the fierceness of a raging lion when he is called upon to defend the rights of the Church …Nothing ought in fact to distinguish us in appearance from other men. Yes, the Catholic exterior may be sociable but let him not the less cherish within him concentrated rage and unconquerable antipathy.

 

C.     Working by Revolution and Class Warfare to Destablilize Opponents

When the ebullition (state of boiling agitation) which we are secretly fomenting shall have reached a sufficient point, the cover shall be suddenly removed, and we shall pour our liquid fire upon those political meddlers who are ignorant and unreflecting enough to serve as tools in our hands, and our efforts will result in a Revolution, worthy of the name, which shall combine in one universal conquest, all the conquests that have been made.

 

For I would not have it lost sight of, that our chief concern must be to mould the people to our purpose … yes, the people are the vast domain we have to conquer … the higher classes are always very inaccessible to the lower ones. Let us nourish their mutual antipathy. Let us accustom the mob, which is in fact an implement of power to look upon us as its warmest advocates: favouring its desires, let us feed the fire of its wrath and open to its view a golden age – the New World Order.

 

D.     Influencing The Great and Powerful

It is upon the great that we ought particularly to exert our influence. We ought

to bring them to believe that in a period as storming as this there is no safety for them but through us. We must give them to understand that the cause of evil, the bad leaven, will remain as long as Protestantism shall exist, the Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished.

 

E.      Using Writers and Authors

We ought by every possible means to secure the aid of modern thinkers, whatever be the nature of their opinions. If they can be induced at all, to write in our favour, let us pay them well in either money or laudation.

 

There are many more extracts BUT these five give readers an idea of the ‘hidden agenda’ of the Catholic Church in general and the Jesuits in particular.

 

Now lets’ briefly examine the perceived and real mission of the notorious Jesuit priest ,Father Charles Coughlin whose influence on millions of Americans (and Canadians) in the 1930’s was enormous. It has been said that at the height of his popularity, one-third of Americans tuned in to hear his weekly radio broadcasts. Though his main message was one of economic populism, as the 1930’s progressed his sermons frequently included obvious attacks on prominent Jewish bankers and he was accused of anti-Semitism.

 

It is likely that Father Coughlin’s Jesuit roots played a significant role is what he was missioned to for the cause of the Catholic Church’ ultimate goal. By late in the 1930’s, the perception of the public was that Father Coughlin had turned against President Roosevelt by his action of blaming the Jews (such as Paul Warburg) for the Great Depression and the New Deal, even referring to it as “the Jew Deal.’ In 1940, his radio broadcasts were labelled anti-Semitic and consequently terminated and he apparently returned to his work as a parish priest. Keep in mind that Father Coughlin remained a personal friend of both President Roosevelt and J. Edgar Hoover – by so doing the Americans’ anti-Jewish fury was hurled at Paul Warburg while all the time the Jesuits really controlled the Federal Reserve Bank – the Frankenstein Fed.

 

Eric Jon Phelps explains that the Great Depression was created to make the Federal Reserve Bank a virtual monopoly and ‘lord of all banking.’ In fact, the Great Depression of the 1930’s caused all of the smaller banks to go bankrupt and indeed the Federal Reserve Bank reigned supreme when the Great Depression was over. On page 443 of ‘Vatican Assassins,’ Eric Jon Phelps asks a question about exactly who caused the Great Depression and he provides an astonishing answer.

 

‘And who caused the Great Depression? According to FDR’s son-in-law, Curtis B. Dall, it was the Knight of Malta, Joe Kennedy. In his book ‘F.D.R.: My Exploited Father-In-Law’ 1968,  we read on pages 119 & 120 “The feeling around the Street, in succeeding months, was that there were, in particular, three large short-sellers of stock, allegedly Tom Bragg, Ben Smith, and Joe Kennedy … Of the three mentioned well-known short-sellers, Joe Kennedy was allegedly the most important, the most powerful and the most successful. This service …made him invaluable. Was Joe Kennedy carefully selected by world money leaders to sell short?’

 

Is it possible that the Catholic Church in cahoots with the Black Pope and Joe Kennedy created and managed the Great Depression? If one front man in cahoots with the Catholic Church hierarchy and the Black Pope could create economic chaos in 1929, how many front men will it take to create economic chaos with a 21st Century Depression? Certainly, the Federal Reserve Bank emerged as the powerful, pr